Please Login or Register to get full access to the forums.

Lost Password? —
Current time: 05-20-2024, 12:44 AM (time should display as Pacific time zone; please contact Admin if it appears to be wrong)                                                                


X-treme Wrestling Federation » XWF OOC » Out Of Character (OOC) Board
Poll: Six Xtreme Title Defenses for a Briefcase?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Six Defenses Makes Sense
82.35%
 14 82.35%
Shut Up, Tony
17.65%
 3 17.65%
Total 17 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
X-Treme Title Reform: Six Defenses for the Case?
Author Message
"Loverboy" Vinnie Lane Offline
The Guy
*********
Administrators


XWF FanBase:
Some of everyone
(cheered; very rarely plays dirty but isn't lame either; many likable qualities)
 (Where is my roster page?)
Joined: Tue Dec 18 2012
Posts: 4,564
1,866,676
Likes Given: 4,423
Likes Received: 2,684 in 987 posts
Hates Given: 25
Hates Received: 69 in 63 posts
Hates Given: 25
Hates Received: 69 in 63 posts
Reputation: 32,866
X-Bux: ✘998,590,381
#50
12-25-2013, 06:53 AM

We definitely don't give the champion the right to make a match non-title. It would need to be special circumstances where all parties (champ/challengers/gm) agreed to turn off the 24/7 rules for a special match. Other than that, like with the Fatback situation, that title is able to be lost ANY time the champion themself is pinned.

House shows would probably never have any title on the line unless it were specially requested by all parties including the champ.
[Image: dR5ZguS.png]
Hate Post Like Post
[-] The following 1 user Likes "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane's post:
Wallace Witasick (12-25-2013)


Messages In This Thread
X-Treme Title Reform: Six Defenses for the Case? - by Not Shane Carver LOL - 12-25-2013, 06:53 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)