Right now, everybody is fighting for something. You know that Nuclear Winter Series thing stickied on the OOC board? When it concludes, it will culminate with a Rumble. That winner earns a shot at the King.

Also, I no longer keep track of wins and losses on Madness. The job I have allows for a much more limited amount of fed time so I converted that Madness site into a title history page.

A rankings system would be somewhat hard to accomplish in a fed environment. For instance, say a top quality writer has 4 matches in one month, all against other top quality writers and only wins two of them. Does that mean he or she should be ranked lower than a guy or girl that had the same amount of matches, won them all, but faced writers of a lesser quality? If you look at it that way, you can see why I'd disagree with that kind of ranking system.