Quote:If everyone was as worried about this rule as they appear to be now, you guys would have caught when Mr. Radio almost received a briefcase with NO successful title defenses during his 6 week+ reign. I was the only one who caught it, and he was told of this rule and informed he needed to schedule a title defense. If he won, he'd get the briefcase. Unfortunately he lost and did not receive a briefcase even though he had the title longer than 6 weeks.

Actually this scenario was brought up a few times, by a few different people in the Skye Chat, as my very first post said yesterday, this isn't about Gilmour specifically. But his actions caused a lot of people to reevaluate the title itself. Sometimes all it takes is for one event for people to stop and look at things. That's what happened here. This isn't about trying to screw Gilmour, it;s about trying to enrich the experience associated with winning and defending the title.

You also mentioned:

Quote:A lot of people don't know that a rule already is in place similar to this, but more lenient. It basically states that in order for a person to receive a briefcase as a result of the X-treme title that person must have had at least one credible title defense that resulted in a victory for that person.

How do you define credible? That seems rather vague. By forcing there to be 6 defenses to earn a brief case it makes the title harder to obtain and makes the rewards more deserving based on the efforts you put in to obtain it.

The Xtreme title is the only one that allows you the opportunity to earn guaranteed shots at other titles, why not make it worth it?