(12-22-2013, 06:11 PM)Theo Pryce Said:

(12-22-2013, 06:10 PM)Wallace Witasick Said:

(12-22-2013, 06:05 PM)Theo Pryce Said: And of course the 6 defenses are picked by the GM's like all other titles are. So the holder can't just say no to certain members and yes to others. That's what defending it during the week on the boards is about.

GMs would probably still take into effect anyone who challenges for the belt and the match is accepted. By all means we still would welcome anyone to challenge the champion to a match for a chance at the title... Just to clarify on that in case someone was wondering.

True that, I may have botched the wording on that a bit. Didn't mean to make it sound like you can't work out something but it shouldn't be the sole deciding factor.

Yeah I went back to edit my post to also include the possibility of a triple threat and/or more competitors. For the record I approve of the 6 title defense idea. Whoever came up with that is a damn genius!