Misty Waters
Always.
XWF FanBase:
The IWC
(gets varying reactions in the arenas, but will be worshiped like a god and defended until the end by internet fans; literally has thousands of online dorks logging on to complain anytime they lose a match or don't get pushed right)
XWF Roster Page
Joined: Tue Sep 13 2016
Posts: 798
378,131
Likes Given: 2,436
Likes Received: 1,193 in 406 posts
Hates Given: 110
Hates Received: 39 in 38 posts
Hates Given: 110
Hates Received: 39 in 38 posts
Reputation:
89
X-Bux: ✘1,131,755
|
07-18-2021, 04:35 PM
I could really care less than I do about attacks. They’ve always been around, and have always worked this way but maybe there could be some revamping done? I’m just saying it seems a lot of people have some issues with it.
If you’re supposed to be booked on a show to be attacked on that show, maybe the attacker should have to be booked as well? This could at least narrow things down for counter attacks and make it less impossible to figure out.
Perhaps make the the entire attacking process more GM involved. Have the end results of an attack be at their discretion, maybe factoring in the bodies of work those involved in the attack produced that cycle- but still leave it up to the GMs on how to build the feud on their program.
Just some thoughts, like I said I could give two birds less. I think attacks are fun, and selling them is a lot of fun too, it builds layers for your character.
|
|
|
|
![[-]](https://xwf99.com/images/portal2/collapse.gif)
|
|
