Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Cain · **09-17-2014, 03:33 PM**

Why are Xtreme Title challenges always pin attempts? Why not ever submission attempts?

Maybe even add rules. Cuz it's easy to say "X kicks out of y's pin", especially if you're online often enough to catch every pin. Have you guys ever considered a simulator engine or dice rolls for Xtreme Title Challenges? Just curious. Back in Fed X, the Bloodsport Title was defended 24/7. They used a sim engine.

Step 1. Roleplay the challenge.
Step 2. "Sim" three matches vs. Champion. Pinfall-2 points Submission - 2 Points Dq and Count Out 1 Point. The engine chooses a winner at random, though activity bonuses can be awarded that week toward simmed matches. First person to 5 points or more wins. This would be posted on OOC board. E.g. X challenges Y. X sims Y, but Y wins with 5 points and retains.
Step 3. Win or lose, X must post his results in RP form within a predetermined timeframe. Failure to do so will eliminate him from challenges for such and such amount of time.

Anyway thats how we did 24/7 titles where I came from. If you wanna learn about "Rp Matches", let me know.

**Vincent Lane** · **09-17-2014, 03:38 PM**

I think it being random kinda diminishes it. Part of being the x champ is having to deal with those pinfalls. If its just a random engine, there's nothing to it.

Blizzard · **09-17-2014, 04:03 PM**

The X-Treme Title has been contested under the same rules for over a decade. I'd hate to see that changed.

Cain · **09-17-2014, 05:00 PM**

Oh no, no need to change it. Just saying what im used to.

Rp matches, for example...each opponent would roleplay the actual "action" that took place in the match. Then a judge would decide the winner, and award "finishing rights".

~~Peter Fn Gilmour~~ · **09-17-2014, 06:08 PM**

submissions should be used! it surprises the champion into thinking he'll get pinned then BAM! submission!

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode Questions
Author	Message