(10-26-2014, 08:20 PM)⤤⇝ℰⱱεℛℑȓųšƬ⇜⤣ Said: " My good sir; you claim your X-treme 25 is based on War Games performances but I must ask—did you watch the show? "

" You just listed a man in the top spot who did his own team zero favors simply to save himself for a cash in after the War Games matches concluded, and if you're putting him in the top spot based on that cash in, you must have also missed who was responsible for making that cash in as effective as it was: Myself and My Crimson Face. Where is Crimson Face on this list if Theo Pryce's post-show activities warrant him a top spot? Yes, I had a professional agreement with Theo Pryce on that night and I've been paid in full but I also recognize that he in no way even belongs on the top 25 of War Games seeing as he did not participate in them. Also, if you're basing his spot in #1 off of him holding the #1 title in this company, you must be unaware of who holds the #2 title in this company. Your rubric must be one of those unsolvable mysteries of science, yes? "

" Secondly, if you're basing those numbers of off performances in the actual War Games matches, I take it upon myself in my ever so selfless wisdom to remind you once again you are mistaken—this time by placing my name above my parter in TrustInSanity. How? Explain. Justin Sane scored the winning pinfall for our team and proved he is among the top tier of this company in what will most likely be remembered as the most successful and influential debut in the history of wrestling. How, might I ask, is he #10 and losing participants are somehow ranked above him? Gator? Vincent Lane? above Sane? Even I myself should not be ranked above him if you actually watched the show, but at least I was on a winning team. Congratulations on discrediting yourself with this list, you blubbering fool. You picked names out of a hat and threw them in a list. I am disgusted to even be named on it at all if it's not based on facts or performances. "