+- X-treme Wrestling Federation (https://xwf99.com)
+-- Forum: XWF OOC (https://xwf99.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=15)
+--- Forum: Out Of Character (OOC) Board (https://xwf99.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=29)
+--- Thread: Are You: TNA vs. WWE (/showthread.php?tid=7876)
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - BBD - 11-01-2013
Who do you prefer?
WWE
or
TNA..
of course you could say ROH, NOAH, Chikara and the likes of course cause we all know who the real best is...
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Ann Thraxx - 11-01-2013
TNA.... WWE sucks. XD
Okay... That's my opinion, anyways.
Still, won't be long before TNA dies .-.
RE: Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Ann Thraxx - 11-01-2013
(11-01-2013, 02:14 AM)Griffin MacAlister Said: I prefer the XWF.
Same, depending on which you mean. I find XWF (the efed) much more interesting than watching the majority of wrestling stuffs.... The company called XWF was great, though. But, this fed is... Awesome. I was gonna say XWF, but decided to express that I prefer TNA over WWE. Lol.
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - BBD - 11-01-2013
TNA > WWE for talent..
Honestly, Austin Aries, Bobby Roode and James Storm are miles better than John Cena, Del Rio, Brodus Clay, David Otunga, JTG and the rest of the idiots on the WWE Payroll..
Although, WWE has Punk, Dbry, Wyatt, Zayn, Cesaro, Ambrose and Jericho which is a supreme win for them..
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - LJ Havok - 11-01-2013
TNA talent wise, but WWE has better everything else. lol I mean I'm intrigued by the WWE storylines, but with TNA's AJ Styles storyline we all know what is going to happen who ever wins the tournament will face AJ to become the undisputed TNA champ when he comes back..its a no brainer. it pisses me off that the insult our intelligence as wrestling fans with recycled stories from the WWE..the only thing at is intriguing about TNA right now is the Bobby Roode and Kurt Angle feud and that is because they put on phenomenal matches.
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Guppy Parsh - 11-01-2013
WWE has a lot of good shit going on, but when I went to BFG last month I had more fun than I had at all the WWE events I went to combined, so I don't know.
On the other hand, CHIKARA hasn't ran a show in like 4 months, but they still have me on the edge of my seat waiting for the next bit of information to surface. I think that makes them the best, since they are still interesting to me without any wrestling happening at all.
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - BBD - 11-01-2013
Chikara hands down are the best to watch, entertainment wise..
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - MattWard - 11-01-2013
i like wrestling in general plus you have PWG, ROH, Reisistance Pro Wrestling, Pro Wrestling Syndicate, those are some good indy promotions, and Chikara is not a running company due to some legal issues i have heard.
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Liz Hathaway - 11-01-2013
That Company named the XWF is better than all of them. I mean, they have a King instead of a World Champion! What originality!
RE: Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Casey Jones - 11-01-2013
(11-01-2013, 03:49 AM)BBD Said: TNA > WWE for talent..
Honestly, Austin Aries, Bobby Roode and James Storm are miles better than John Cena, Del Rio, Brodus Clay, David Otunga, JTG and the rest of the idiots on the WWE Payroll..
Although, WWE has Punk, Dbry, Wyatt, Zayn, Cesaro, Ambrose and Jericho which is a supreme win for them..
Del Rio is solid as fuck, he just hasn't been given an interesting story. He's great in-ring and is a good heel, as can be seen here:
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Juan Madison - 11-01-2013
Yeah, BBD picked a terrible list of names to compare against TNA's talent.
I cant even remember the last time Clay, Otunga, and JTG were on a PPV or Raw for that matter.
I actually don't mind Cena. A lot of his matches are predictable, but if you give him the right opponent he'll put on a classic match. Plus he's their cash cow so I can understand why he's used a bunch. Throw him in TNA and I'm pretty sure they would do the exact same thing, if they want to stay in business (which TNA aren't by the looks of it).
What makes WWE better than TNA for me is the fact that they balance out their roster so that there's something for everyone. You've got the indie guys like Bryan, Cesaro, and Punk. You've got characters for the family like Cena, Tons of Funk, and Fandango. There's legends who show up for an occasional match like Undertaker, Lesnar, and Rock. Then there's guys who you find in between those categories like RVD, Big Show, Shield, and the Wyatts.
In fact, other than Otunga, JTG, Khali, and 3MB-- all of which are barely shown for more than 5 minutes-- I can't think of anyone in WWE who isn't worth watching.
With TNA, I can't say that I care about anything that's going on with them. The AJ Styles storyline just seems like a copy of Punk's 2011 storyline.
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Peter Fn Gilmour - 11-01-2013
i like ROH myself.. and a little bit of PWG
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Casey Jones - 11-03-2013
3MB...or more specifically Drew McIntyre... are being wasted. Drew is really talented, but for some reason he's stuck in jobber status
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Dr. Zero - 11-03-2013
I just watch my Chikara DVDs and Ashes YouTube videos.
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Dr. Zero - 11-03-2013
Also, Kaiju Big Battel is pretty awesome.
RE: Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Smoke - 11-03-2013
(11-03-2013, 04:35 AM)Casey Jones Said: 3MB...or more specifically Drew McIntyre... are being wasted. Drew is really talented, but for some reason he's stuck in ****** status
Agreed. Always liked Drew. He needs a decent solo run, split him from the rest of 3MB and I think he'll work wonders.
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Peter Fn Gilmour - 11-03-2013
they were talking about having drew turn on 3MB soon.. I liked Drew as the chosen one and he needs the IC title back and hold onto it for a very long time
RE: Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Cam Lang - 11-03-2013
(11-01-2013, 06:54 PM)Michael McBride Said: I pick WWE. One reason.
The Undertaker.
I remember watching my first RAW. It was around when Taker made the ministry of darkness. Since then I've watched WWE because of The Undertaker. As soon as he retires I won't be watching WWE anymore. There would be no point. He's the reason why I still watch it. TNA could never make someone like him. Ever. Sorry just what I feel. No one on the TNA roster can hold a candle to that man.
Taker is also my all time favorite, I had started watching around when he debuted the american bad ass gimmick, I stopped watching for a while until early 2006 when I started watching again, when he was in that feud with Henry and afterwards Khali. I'm not sure how much longer I'll watch the WWE, for the past year I've noticed I'm starting to become less interested, I'll always have RAW on TV but only pay attention to the really important storylines. Battleground was the first PPV I didn't watch in years.
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - BBD - 11-03-2013
That's cause Battleground sucked... so did HIAC actually.. WWE have seriously let their product diminish because they have life long fans.. They have people who wont' jump ship because there is no "competition".
TNA is going out of business and it needs all the fans it can get, hence why they try so much harder than WWE but can't seem to break away from the WCW formatting. They need to breed new World Champions, instead of AJ, Bully, Sting, Hardy and/or Angle going for another title run. They have something in EC3 and Magnus and they should promote those guys instead.
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Peter Fn Gilmour - 11-04-2013
EC3 SUCKS! he gets no reaction
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - BBD - 11-05-2013
Yeah cause TNA has built him up to big this huge star they should know.. but Bateman did sweet fuck all in WWE so most people are like "who da fuq are you?" the rest are just unimpressed he can beat a twig in a fight
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Peter Fn Gilmour - 11-05-2013
hes beating PWG jobbers! how can u react to that?
RE: Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Casey Jones - 11-05-2013
(11-04-2013, 10:34 PM)Peter Fn Gilmour Said: EC3 SUCKS! he gets no reaction
Calm yo' tits, EC3 is a friend
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Peter Fn Gilmour - 11-05-2013
of yours?
Are You: TNA vs. WWE - Tri Bute - 11-05-2013
The world needs EC3. He's a Carter.