![]() |
Important: ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Printable Version +- X-treme Wrestling Federation (https://xwf99.com) +-- Forum: XWF OOC (https://xwf99.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Forum: Out Of Character (OOC) Board (https://xwf99.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=29) +--- Thread: Important: ON SELLING/NO SELLING (/showthread.php?tid=34743) |
ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 This is silly and I can't believe I have to say something about it, but here we are. Interaction has to be mutual. If you are bombarding someone with posts/comments/PMs/whatever trying to get their attention and it is clearly unwanted, cut it the fuck out. Spamming someone's profile with a bunch of cut and paste nonsense because they aren't giving you the attention you want is stupid. That isn't roleplaying. No one else even sees it unless they know it's there, you're just harassing someone one on one. No one is required to sell for you if they don't want to, outside of treating canon XWF events as such. Matches, etc. Furthermore, in case anyone is unfamiliar with the term "godmodding," what it refers to is taking full control over someone else's IC character or universe and doing with it what you see fit, without any consent or input from anyone else. Such as, I don't know, let me just think of something off the top of my head at random, BURNING SOMEONE'S GOD DAMN HOUSE DOWN. Think about this: if I just decide one day to post a segment where I show up to James Raven's house and murder his family, sell his kids into slavery, and rape his dog... should he have to sell it for me if he doesn't want to? No. That's ![]() So - if your character's whole gimmick is "post a bunch of threads begging for attention" - that's fine. Knock yourself out. But don't assume anyone is REQUIRED to give you that attention. Hell, maybe THEIR character's IC response is to ignore you because they know it's bothering you. MAYBE that is part of the story. But once it crosses over to IRL annoyances like a dozen comment alerts a day or repeated PMs, that's an issue. Once it turns into godmodding where you're causing changes to someone's story without their permission, that's an issue. And frankly, some of you should know better. Thanks. ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 That's right guys. If someone wants to exist in their own little bubble and only do Twitter posts, let them exist in their own little bubble. Board activity should always be kept to a minimum here dammit! Nobody should have to ever alter their own prearranged stories for you or interact with you! Sorry, had to. Lol re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 I knew you were going to reply to this. Honestly though, YEAH, if someone doesn't want to do anything other than RP, then that's their prerogative. Trolling people on the forums serves absolutely no purpose. ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 Well duh I'd reply. You suckered me in with the dog rape line. You knew what you were doing!!!! re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Lacklan - 09-12-2019 Awe, lets not beat around the bush, boys! Lets just get to the crux of this so I can get back to work and everyone can be back to talking shit in the Discord! Since the initial Hooded Man seg, I have sold the story within the context of promos to a variety of degrees. From anger (Sar being pissed at Vinnie for shitty security) to humor (hiring the idiotic team of Bobbi and Max to act as security and detectives) to a narrative that shows she is seriously spooked and worrisome (in the hospital with Kenzi). In fact, I have mentioned and sold the Hooded Man issue in something to the effect of 8 or 9 out of the 11 or 12 promos I have written since the angle first began...including a reference or two in promos not for this fed! I have NOT, however, sold it in any way on the boards IC, that much I can certainly admit to. But! I have also DRASTICALLY cut down on my IC board work in the last few months for a few reasons. This brings us to why this thread even got posted. In between logging in last night to check a PM and then logging in a bit later to submit a match, I had 8 (eight!) new comments on my personal page from Hooded Man, which brings the total amount of comments on my page to a staggering 39 (thirty nine!) and I snapped. I said this: Quote:TheHoodedMan,No really, fully and 100% OOC here: Fuck off with your godmodding, world-altering, character-destroying shit. What started off as something interesting turned into some random dude forcing himself into my world and crying about me not selling it the way HE wanted MY character to act and, ended up with you trying to drastically change my character without my consent, much less my input. Only reason that's getting sold as much as it is is because Kenzi is a better person than I am. If you want to tell a story then how about actually telling a story and putting something on the line like...oh I don't know...cutting promos for matches? If you aren't going to do that, then go bug someone else with this crap. I literally only log on here now to submit matches and promos because I'm so tired of seeing 27 comments on my page. Now, his replay was: Quote:Sorry dude but all I wanted was a 1 on 1 in public and I would have left you alone. Thats all. I'll stop with the comments in here, in this section but won't stop on the forum until I get that 1 on 1. Sorry to piss you off so much. Now! As I have made it pretty clear both IC and OOC...of course, I do realize this would require people commenting and giving their shitty opinions of me to actually read my work before commenting, but I'm well aware how few people actually do that...I'm all for stuff in promos! Cut a promo, get booked in a match, etc etc. Ya know, the whole fucking point of this dumb game we have all been sinking our lives into for two decades. Anyway, the idea that I have been no-selling this whole thing is garbage. Wanna do some cool one-on-one thing? Sure! Book it on a show! But don't sit here and cry and moan and cast me as some unworkable bad guy who only wants to sit in his own little bubble. That's bullshit and my vast array of work featuring other handlers is testament to that. I'll leave everyone alone so you can post your scat, now! re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 Ugghhhhhhhhhhhhhh ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 Calm down. We love you! But yeah, even I could tell from the get go he wanted an IC 1 on 1 on the boards. Not sure how that was missed but maybe I pay too close of attention. re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 I think the point is though, that a back and forth on the boards isn't something someone HAS to do. If one person wants it and the other doesn't, then that's it. Post on the boards all you want! Like you said, Shane, activity is great. But profile comments aren't board activity. That's just annoying shit. ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 True. I remember having to remove plenty of profile comments from people in the past. I also told those people they could block the offender which stops that person's ability to post profile comments and solves the whole issue. No reason to go crazy about it. Personally I thought the whole burning down of the house story was one of the more interesting storylines going on and I was curious to see where it went. Now we'll probably never know! lol re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 It CAN be interesting, but you know that sort of thing requires consent. That's nothing new. I think the way they have responded to it is the best it can be responded to. Take it, flip it, make it funny... but I think it's pretty straightforward and accepted that you can't just go alter someone else's story/universe/character on a whim. I don't think Lacklan's response was too crazy, she just posted a comment that was kind of angry. We've all done worse. She didn't come to me and complain, either, I just saw it and responded on my own because I don't want that sort of thing going on. I don't want ANYone to leave or lower their participation because they are forced to deal with someone else, you know what I mean? re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - TheHoodedMan - 09-12-2019 Honestly... With the burning down of the house segment, I didn't think it through, and I must admit that was a step too far. So I would like to apologize publicly. I will stop my harassment of Sarah and her Handler, and leave it be. I didn't think what I was doing was changing someones character or character's universe and like I said all I wanted was a public 1 on 1 conversation. Not a match because we all know who'll win there. I had fun doing what I was doing, and sort of got egged on by others, so I got too out of controlled and for that I apologize. Sorry Sarah, Sorry too to her Handler. You shall be left alone as of right now. ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 I suppose the part that throws me off is how, as you said, there was SOME sort of IC response to the burning house. I figured there must have at least been some coordination between all of them if it went that far after the fact, but if it was genuinely unwanted they probably should have pumped the breaks as soon as that segment aired? Instead of play along at all? I dunno. As a guy who likes to do random IC posts myself and stir shit up, I really liked the idea of other people possibly doing the same and sparking more activity and more thinking outside of the box. I know you remember how fun it was back in the day when we'd have dozens of threads and back-and-forths going on outside of RPs. This thread today just struck me as "damn, there goes that hope" to some extent. Now Soldier and I have to post even more insane BS to make up for the loss! re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 I think this raises an interesting point - if it isn't meant to lead to a match, then why does it exist? What would the endgame be if on-show interaction isn't the goal? I'm all for forum back and forth, but IMO it serves to be asupplement for the main crux of the fed, which is the shows and the matches therein. Do others feel differently? (09-12-2019, 07:38 AM)TheHoodedMan Said: Honestly... With the burning down of the house segment, I didn't think it through, and I must admit that was a step too far. So I would like to apologize publicly. I will stop my harassment of Sarah and her Handler, and leave it be. re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 It wouldn't be apparent to anyone that doesn't know Sarah and Kenzi outside of the fed, but I personally know that Sarah was planning on completely ignoring it. Kenzi took it and ran with it because Kenzi will sell literally anything, just for the fuck of it. Lacklan actually posted a LOT of threads not long ago but mostly got no sold herself in them, outside of a handful of people who would interact. I agree it can totally be a lot of fun if everyone is into it and having fun with it, BUT it can also be a shitshow if things go too far. (09-12-2019, 07:41 AM)Shane <img src="https://i.imgur.com/pUgtAVa.gif"> Said: I suppose the part that throws me off is how, as you said, there was SOME sort of IC response to the burning house. I figured there must have at least been some coordination between all of them if it went that far after the fact, but if it was genuinely unwanted they probably should have pumped the breaks as soon as that segment aired? Instead of play along at all? I dunno. re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - TheHoodedMan - 09-12-2019 (09-12-2019, 07:42 AM)"Loverboy" Vinnie Lane Said: I think this raises an interesting point - if it isn't meant to lead to a match, then why does it exist? The end game was to make Sarah do something she didn't want to do, to be in control of something for once other than be controlled by her. I know this is a game. I know this is supposed to be make believe and all that fun and stuff, but once you got Sarahed, I'll call it that, a couple of times, once she starts controlling the issues, and the game, and to a point feeling like you've been victimized, you can't go back and will always be laughed and made fun of... by Sarah, and then the rest of the crowd. I just wanted her to feel what I felt. To just give a little bit of control over for once and then I would have easily felt the satisfaction of at least temporary having a little bit of control and just move on from there, and leave well alone. Now I know that may sound harsh that I called it being victimized, but at the end of the day it haunts you. And you feel for a few days well, that's that then. My characters being made fun of and there's no coming back from that. And others will forever see you as the weak link going on from that, and jump on the bandwagon. Like I said I took it too far and I apologize. I became the bully. Now I'm not saying Sarah's a bully. I just felt like she was. I just wanted a bit of pay back so I took it too far, and I'll stop. ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Centurion - 09-12-2019 We have immortal demigods in this fed. I think "selling" is kind of an archaic concept when you take that into consideration. re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 This is a weird post. (09-12-2019, 08:04 AM)TheHoodedMan Said:(09-12-2019, 07:42 AM)"Loverboy" Vinnie Lane Said: I think this raises an interesting point - if it isn't meant to lead to a match, then why does it exist? re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Vita Frickin Valenteen - 09-12-2019 If THM didnt want to face Sarah, but wanted to play mind games instead, he could have picked a "champion" to wrestle in his place and work his gimmick more like a master mind / manager. I feel like there is a missed opportunity here. Also, I don't know what everyone elses policies are, but I always contact anyone that I'm working with to work out ideas for segments unless they're just your standard match run in ir backstage attack (for a show that I know they are booked on) I dont think the issue here is the angle, just some if the more trollish aspects of what was going on. ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Vita Frickin Valenteen - 09-12-2019 With that said, if any of this stems from ooc heat, which reading over THM response earlier about feeling victimized and wanting Sarah to feel that way as well... maybe? Idk, but if so, then perhaps it is best to just drop it. re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 I agree, that post made it seem like there's some sort of OOC hard feelings, which doesn't make sense and is really NEVER a good idea to try and handle like this. re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Ned Kaye - 09-12-2019 re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-12-2019 Shut up Ned you're ugly. ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Noah Jackson - 09-12-2019 I just got Sarah'ed on Twitter so I'm on Hooded Man's side now. Jokes. Where's Santos with Baker Street? ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Tony Santos - 09-12-2019 You read my mind, Noah. re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - drezdin5788 - 09-12-2019 (09-12-2019, 07:38 AM)TheHoodedMan Said: Honestly... With the burning down of the house segment, I didn't think it through, and I must admit that was a step too far. So I would like to apologize publicly. I will stop my harassment of Sarah and her Handler, and leave it be.Bull shit re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - CTN - 09-12-2019 You people are weird bro... 😂 ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Corey Smith - 09-12-2019 This is a good thread. I mean that, because I think it's good to clarify these things from time to time. I also feel kind of bad because I made a jokey pithy comment on Twitter about Sarah no selling the house fire. Sorry! I'm of two minds on this. I love slugging it out on the boards to build heat and develop angles and storylines. The fire thing did go a little too far though and seems like the kind of thing that should have been an OOC collab to set it up. To me it's just a form of respect. Of course, what's good for the goose can be good for the gander and I'm not innocent of similar conduct. Like when Engy got a shit swirly and I retaliated by having Engy give Theo's wife a shit swirly. Thankfully, it ended at that, but I could see how something like that could end up being an efed nuclear arms race of sorts. I think I understand what Hooded Man was saying about getting "Sarah'd" and wanting to strike back. I'm 95% sure I know who Hoodie is, so I get what he's saying. Sarah has a tendency in character to hammer on certain characters/topics over and over again, so yeah, this whole angle seems like a reaction to OOC heat which as Vinnie (I think) said is just....not the way to go about this. I'm reasonably sure Sarah would have been willing to work on this angle WITH you. As it stood it just became awkward and antagonistic. Dude, just chill. If Sarah reams you out character just call her dumb and don't take it personally. Maybe post some dank memes about how she was in a shitty vampire movie. I dunno. Edit: Holy fuck I just looked at all those profile posts, lol. I woulda reamed him a new asshole ages ago, Sarah has a halo re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - B.O.B. D - 09-12-2019 ^^^^^what Lux said I know when I first got here, I HATED Sarah. Read her RPs, then went at it with her for the Federweight, and I thought she was a bitch. But then I worked with her for War Games and remembered.........this is a GAME. The way we act IC is usually different than how we are IRL. If she said something offensive, it was very likely to get heat and push her character. Which is to be expected in character. Now, if she sent a PM and was harassing you, that'd be different. But at that point I wouldn't make it about IC, I'd take it up with her or Vinnie personally and figure out the problem. ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Tony Santos - 09-12-2019 Honestly, it seems like heat towards a character because it’s a female character (male handler, of course). This screams of the type of harassment only women face in real life, directed towards someone because its character is a woman. Just don’t fucking do it again, THM. You likely wouldn’t do it to a male character, so don’t let your biases creep into this fake world. Be better. Lacklan has a kickass character that is good enough to get under people’s skin. You weren’t bullied, you played the e-fed game and couldn’t handle it, because it was a female character. Baker Street or something. re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Steve_Justice - 09-12-2019 (09-12-2019, 07:53 PM)Tony Santos Said: Honestly, it seems like heat towards a character because it’s a female character (male handler, of course). This screams of the type of harassment only women face in real life, directed towards someone because its character is a woman. Clutch your pearls a little tighter why don't you? The only thing more pathetic than THM is you with your White Knighting and virtue signalling. The issue has been dealt with, shut your mouth. Nobody's giving you a "most outraged" award and you're not getting your dick sucked, you fucking neckbeard. Jesus fucking christ.... re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Noah Jackson - 09-12-2019 (09-12-2019, 08:39 PM)Steve_Justice Said: Clutch your pearls a little tighter why don't you? The only thing more pathetic than THM is you with your White Knighting and virtue signalling. The issue has been dealt with, shut your mouth. Nobody's giving you a "most outraged" award and you're not getting your dick sucked, you fucking neckbeard. Jesus fucking christ.... Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you, an incel. Santos gave an opinion, don't be a dick dude. ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Steve_Justice - 09-12-2019 My apologies to Santos. I regretted what I said as soon as I hit send. I was dealing with IRL frustrations and unfortunately brought them on here. I'm sorry, my bad. re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - drezdin5788 - 09-12-2019 (09-12-2019, 08:39 PM)Steve_Justice Said:If there was ever a definition of mommas little rejected muppet(09-12-2019, 07:53 PM)Tony Santos Said: Honestly, it seems like heat towards a character because it’s a female character (male handler, of course). This screams of the type of harassment only women face in real life, directed towards someone because its character is a woman. ![]() I mean what in the fuck is wrong with you? Thank fucking god i dont know why in the you just shit on someone who just gave a valid opinion and puked on him. Secondl, you even know what a white knight is muchless how to use it in the proper context? Thirdly, because.....well even you are a white knight yourself. Dont believe me? Go read to yourself what you just said say it out loud. And last but not least four. You mentioned the word pathetic. If you think about in reality, your actually the pathetic one here. You see at this one moment in time garbage has more value then you. I mean im still trying to figure out why this place is STILL holding onto unwanted strash like you. All i ever wanted to do is to go out in a blaze glory from this company, that's all i want. But not till this daddys little dick child comes and ruins. Ill see if the boss will let me add a 26th and kill you first ON SELLING/NO SELLING - "Loverboy" Vinnie Lane - 09-13-2019 Somehow this has been the most active, passionate, and love/hate filled thread on the boards in some time, with an always refreshing pinch of triggered spice. It also has apparently killed off one of the very few storylines going on that everyone was aware of at least to some degree. It's weird how I'm one of the only ones who sees that or thinks it matters IN AN E FED. What happened to you guys? When did XWF the e-fed close down and instead turn into... (Oh I better not say it or someone will surely rage out) Seriously though. Put some time and effort into creativity and storylines that spark daily activity again and maybe weirdo threads like these wouldn't be the highlight of the day/week. The absolute BEST angles and storylines I ever saw play out in efedding over that past two decades were sparked by UNPLANNED (ooc wise) attacks, insults, reactions, counters, etc... etc... Yet now anyone who sees this will be afraid to even dare try something like that. Learn to meet in the middle and exercise common sense on both fronts. Don't go to extremes with using PMs, profile comments, ratings, etc as IC tools. START going back to extremes using minor IC posts (yes there are several sections for those) as IC tools. The only thread that even comes close to competing with this one is VV's new shirt thread, and even it is dwarfed by this one in reply and view count. It's staggering how dead these boards are and how so few of you couldn't care less unless it's an ooc thread. I'm reminded of why I at one point limited access to even viewing the OOC forum several years ago while I was owner. Maybe this is all my fault because I got careless for a couple years and stopped reminding people this is an E FED before I eventually stepped down as owner, but I still do care and I am one of the few who has the ability to see what's really happening and I can clearly see the E FED is in trouble if this is what sparks activity. Watch the transformation and growth this place experiences over the next couple months if you guys can focus again. Watch how many talented, NEW names we attract and retain instead of scaring away with IC sections that are like ghost towns. HM and Sarah, I do hope you guys can both keep the storyline going. ...or even start new ones that get people talking IN character if you guys can't look past this and play the game together. Let's see how many people feel the need to address what I said with MORE OOC, and let's see those same people NOT put equal or greater effort into any IC threads (outside of RPing) today. Lets see which staff member replies and tries to snuff out the fire I just tried to light under everyone's ass. Multiple IC interaction forums to use. Multiple 24/7 titles available. There is more than OOC, guys. Let's light this place up before Christmas time!!! re:ON SELLING/NO SELLING - Theo Pryce - 09-13-2019 (09-12-2019, 08:39 PM)Steve_Justice Said: Clutch your pearls a little tighter why don't you? The only thing more pathetic than THM is you with your White Knighting and virtue signalling. The issue has been dealt with, shut your mouth. Nobody's giving you a "most outraged" award and you're not getting your dick sucked, you fucking neckbeard. Jesus fucking christ.... Comments like these are not productive. |