+- X-treme Wrestling Federation (https://xwf99.com)
+-- Forum: XWF OOC (https://xwf99.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=15)
+--- Forum: Out Of Character (OOC) Board (https://xwf99.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=29)
+--- Thread: So, I had an idea.... (/showthread.php?tid=29542)
So, I had an idea.... - The Engineer - 10-10-2017
Don't be scared. But I want to do a Shove It, and I've been trying to roll around some interesting concepts in my head and I've come up with this, but I'm not sure if it's allowed so a boss man will likely have to give this the ok.
What I was thinking is a Shove It where every title is on the line. It's mandatory. But the catch is the champions get to pick their challengers. It would have to be somebody on the active roster (or somebody they can successfully drag out of retirement). But I think it has the potential to create a neat dynamic in that usually a challenger is "forced" on a champion, and in this case the champion could pick someone they personally feel is deserving, deserving and overlooked, or even NOT deserving to give themselves what they think is an easy title defense.
How do we feel about this? Doable, or Dumpster Fire Part Deux?
So, I had an idea.... - Peter Fn Gilmour - 10-10-2017
seems like a good idea
So, I had an idea.... - Samuel Madison - 10-10-2017
Sounds interesting, but how does it work? Are all if the champs opted in automatically and then the only other people opted in are who the champs decide to face?
*On edit
Nigga
So, I had an idea.... - Equinox - 10-10-2017
The planning would have to be precise but probably not a good idea. A better idea is to have a team of champions against a team of challengers, War-Games style.
So, I had an idea.... - Peter Fn Gilmour - 10-10-2017
^well isnt that what WORLD WAR X is?
re:So, I had an idea.... - Theo Pryce - 10-10-2017
(10-10-2017, 05:37 PM)Peter Fn Gilmour Said: ^well isnt that what WORLD WAR X is?
Not really.
War Games is teams of 5 usually but it could be more or less facing each other. Not sure if that is what you are thinking of but it wasn't just a team of champs vs challengers. Not that it couldn't be done that way. I'm sure there would be a lot of discussion on how the upcoming War Games will be done.
World War X was two massive teams facing each other over the course of a few different matches all in one Pay Per View. I think it started with a 1 on 1. Then a 2 on 2, then 3 on 3 and then so on and so forth. Each team had like 20 people or something crazy. That was a fun PPV imo.
Regarding Engy's question, I definitely think that is a cool concept. It might not hurt to give the people opting in on what titles they would like a crack at. Not that it guarantees a shot at said title but like if Wrestle B opts in for say a shot at the Hart or TV for whatever reasons they have then they shouldn't get booked into a Uni title match or an X title match know what I mean? Just my two cents. But overall I dig the idea.
re:So, I had an idea.... - The Engineer - 10-10-2017
(10-10-2017, 05:47 PM)Theo Pryce Said: Regarding Engy's question, I definitely think that is a cool concept. It might not hurt to give the people opting in on what titles they would like a crack at. Not that it guarantees a shot at said title but like if Wrestle B opts in for say a shot at the Hart or TV for whatever reasons they have then they shouldn't get booked into a Uni title match or an X title match know what I mean? Just my two cents. But overall I dig the idea.
That would kind of defeat the purpose of what I'm going for though. I wanted the champions to each pick their individual challengers. Of course, the challengers wouldn't be OBLIGATED to accept, they could say no of course. Also, that isn't to say that some enterprising folks couldn't lobby to be picked either. I could see some IC debates happening on the forums where people petition to be chosen regardless of their individual ranking,record, etc...
But yeah, it's just an idea in the early stages. If folks don't think it'll work I'll just go with Plan B which is every match is a Bra and Panties match.
So, I had an idea.... - Imperial - 10-10-2017
I think it's an interesting idea. And if you got all the current active champions on board, I don't see why not! The running of the show as a shove-it might be iffy, not sure how management makes decisions on those things. I also think it'd need quite a decent RP window to allow for varying schedules and such. I'm onboard with reading/writing for this PPV if it does come to fruit.
re:So, I had an idea.... - Peter Fn Gilmour - 10-10-2017
(10-10-2017, 05:47 PM)Theo Pryce Said:(10-10-2017, 05:37 PM)Peter Fn Gilmour Said: ^well isnt that what WORLD WAR X is?
Not really.
War Games is teams of 5 usually but it could be more or less facing each other. Not sure if that is what you are thinking of but it wasn't just a team of champs vs challengers. Not that it couldn't be done that way. I'm sure there would be a lot of discussion on how the upcoming War Games will be done.
World War X was two massive teams facing each other over the course of a few different matches all in one Pay Per View. I think it started with a 1 on 1. Then a 2 on 2, then 3 on 3 and then so on and so forth. Each team had like 20 people or something crazy. That was a fun PPV imo.
Regarding Engy's question, I definitely think that is a cool concept. It might not hurt to give the people opting in on what titles they would like a crack at. Not that it guarantees a shot at said title but like if Wrestle B opts in for say a shot at the Hart or TV for whatever reasons they have then they shouldn't get booked into a Uni title match or an X title match know what I mean? Just my two cents. But overall I dig the idea.
Ooc: answer your pm bub
re:So, I had an idea.... - The Engineer - 10-10-2017
(10-10-2017, 06:48 PM)DannyImperial Said: I think it's an interesting idea. And if you got all the current active champions on board, I don't see why not! The running of the show as a shove-it might be iffy, not sure how management makes decisions on those things. I also think it'd need quite a decent RP window to allow for varying schedules and such. I'm onboard with reading/writing for this PPV if it does come to fruit.
As a general rule I think administration needs to sign off on any match outcome decisions for Shove It, but yeah I wouldnt be making all those calls on my own.
Alternately, if this is too high stakes for a Shove It maybe we could just do this for a couple titles.
So, I had an idea.... - drezdin5788 - 10-11-2017
What I would do is as far as pick who to defend their tile against, I would make it as if I was to pick who I wanna take revenge on instead of picking some one outta retirement. But that's just me.
So, I had an idea.... - Equinox - 10-11-2017
Maybe as a build up, have a battle Royale to determine the pool of challengers or have people lobby to be a challenge, then allow the champs to pick their opponent
So, I had an idea.... - "The Wolf of Afghanistan" Joshua Schuler - 10-14-2017
Haven't been around in a grip, but I am liking this idea.
re:So, I had an idea.... - drezdin5788 - 10-14-2017
(10-14-2017, 11:54 AM)Bearded War Pig Said: Haven't been around in a grip, but I am liking this idea.Long time no see bwp
So, I had an idea.... - "The Wolf of Afghanistan" Joshua Schuler - 10-14-2017
Yesh, yesh. Long time. Feels good to be back on tbe boards.
So, I had an idea.... - Peter Fn Gilmour - 10-14-2017
Welcome back bwp u bastard
So, I had an idea.... - JimCaedus - 10-15-2017
Fuckin A, welcome back BDub!
-Eng' I like your original concept 'cause it sounds wicked as fuck from the champ side and I think it would entertain and draw a lot of attention from the handlers and guests but I do see the logic in the points Nox, Theo and Drez made. I honestly very much like the altered versions (ppl can decline, ppl can lobby) and hope the event happens
(10-10-2017, 05:30 PM)Equinox Said: A better idea is to have a team of champions against a team of challengers, War-Games style.
I want this to happen whether it's part of Engy's card or not, that'd be a lot of fun
(10-11-2017, 02:57 PM)Equinox Said: Maybe as a build up, have a battle Royale to determine the pool of challengers
Another cool idea, I'm equally as down for that setup as I am for both the straight forward challenge without obligation and the petition option
'Theo Pryce Said:World War X was two massive teams facing each other over the course of a few different matches all in one Pay Per View. I think it started with a 1 on 1. Then a 2 on 2, then 3 on 3 and then so on and so forth. Each team had like 20 people or something crazy.
Oh fuuuuuuuckin A, THIS needs to happen too on it's own.
I'm still disappointed there was never enough stables for a true stable war. I wish we could figure a way to do something like that as well.
So, I had an idea.... - drezdin5788 - 10-15-2017
Hey bwp, are you ever goin to come back and kick some ass?