04-19-2014, 08:59 PM
Hello, Romulus.
Since you felt the overwhelming need to state all the things you claim to be at the beginning of your promo, I feel the need to add in a few more "boasts" that are definitely much more accurate.
You are cowardice.
You are unrepentant idiocy.
You are unbridled arrogance.
You are not intimidating.
Now, that last one is special because it directly contradicts your claim of being fear. Obviously, you aren't fear, and in reality are nowhere even remotely close to conjuring up such an emotion from anyone with mental capabilities greater than a particularly daft lab rat. However, for argument's sake, allow me to put this little perplexing (to those who actually find themselves afraid of Romulus) bit of hearsay in the context of an indirect proof:
Assume that Romulus Heinrich Winters is, indeed, fear. The obvious conclusion someone would jump to, as should always be the case whenever someone tries to claim themselves to be the embodiment of fear, is that they should frighten, intimidate, unnerve, you. Correct? Correct. However, as I already stated; he is not intimidating. Therefore, he cannot be the living personification of the primal emotion of fear.
His claim?
Nullified.
Reductio ad absurdum.
And yet, I'm well aware that he'll ignore this because it directly challenges his ego. It pokes even more holes in the Swiss cheese that is his ethos. However, I find solace in the fact that I can do unto all of his claims what I did unto his boast of being fear. I can find solace in this because no matter his attempts at telling others to disregard it and fall over themselves to do his bidding as the embodiment of "power," the truth won't be able to be crushed that easily.
That's the thing with ideas.
Once they're planted in peoples' minds, the "power" of those who wish to suppress them is nullified. Much like your claims of being fear.
You really shouldn't make such blanket statements, Romulus. They only serve in your now self induced suffocation as I continue to smother the life out of everything you said. Now, can you turn around and say that this little war of wits is ultimately pointless and that the real test will come when we meet in the ring to deflect this deflation of your claims, but I know this isn't the case.
Something major that needs to be understood for this conjecture to make sense is that Romulus Heinrich Winters is a major narcissist. Anyone with the audacity to make such bold claims in spite of all the evidence against it and how easy it is to disprove in a way has to be, for it's the only way they can be blind to something so apparent, the blind can see it from miles away. Thus, once faced with the revelation that he isn't anything near what he promises himself to be, he'll react in one of two ways.
Either:
A. He'll say it all isn't true, and actively deny all my claims while still retaining the knowledge that the words are true, which will sneakily eat away at his mental state. With that on his mind, he won't be able to put his full ability into the match, thus rendering him a lost cause, so to speak.
Or.
B. He'll acknowledge it and his narcissism, and work to better himself.
Though, I doubt the second option will be the one he chooses.
All of this, deduced solely from his initial claims. I haven't even gotten to the main body of his message; how could I when his thesis is so fundamentally flawed?
And I'm not even done yet. For unlike Romulus, I intend on proving my claims about him.
Like the fact that he's a coward. Again, that would be another thing would contradict his theory of being fear but I'm not getting back on that topic.
He proved his cowardice by declining a challenge put forth after he decided to demand someone to face him.
Right, he backed down from a challenge issued by someone responding to his issued challenge.
Yet, he'll claim that he was being strategic or some other lie fabricated in an attempt to save face. Truth is, he backed down from the first challenge lobbed at him after claiming all of the XWF to be spineless imps, shying away from him out of fear. So, allow me to return to the land of Indirect Proofs once more to talk about my claim of his cowardice.
Assume he isn't a coward. Naturally, one would assume that because of this, he wouldn't back down from a fight. However, this is contradicted by the fact that he did back down from a fight. Therefore, it can be concluded that he is indeed, a coward.
And as for the other two claims of mine? Already proven.
Now, for the equally as preposterous claims he makes in the main part of this address. The tour de force of moronic drivel.
First thing's first (and skipping past his threats to Brock Lesnar and someone I could've sworn died recently in a tragic tea accident): he claims forthright to be Cain. From the Biblical story of Cain and Abel. I'm Agnostic. Your Biblical references have no hold on my thought process, as I have no connection to that story. And yet, you emphasize it as if it's something all men and women will bow down and universally fear.
Which leads me to another lapse in logic: he claims to have gone by many names. Something that would be kind of clever, in the sense of promoting your own "evilness" with shoutouts and references to famous evil people but then he makes the mistake of saying he was Stalin and Hitler.
At the same time?
Also, what is this "in essence" thing? I assume it would help to answer my first question, and yet since he was so vague in his description, I'm left guessing as to what he means by it and assuming he does in fact mean he was both men at the same time which leads me to some very interesting conclusions -- most notably being he's lying again.
Also, he says Hannibal. Like, Hannibal of Carthage? How does he fit at all? If you wanted someone more fitting from that era, why not Nero?
Or Caligula if you wanted something on the more delightfully insane side?
Why Hannibal?
Oh, Lecter.
The fictional character.
Right. Silly me. I should've guessed something on that level of sense would come from the man who's given us such brilliant contributions to the field of delightfully dreadful dimwittedness.
And then he lists all these really great things that "can't happen to him" because he's some kind of time travelling, shape shifting demon or whatever it is he's trying to be. All well and good, if I was watching some sort of Fantasy movie where your evil force is vanquished by the plucky adventurer with the never say quit attitude and too many leotards for one guy to ever own.
I'm listening. I swear I am.
Oh, but I'm not even at the homestretch -- the crowning moment of stupidity yet.
After claiming to be Cain -- from the Biblical story of Cain and Abel, he pretty much says not to put too much faith in God's existence.
That is literally too stupid to poke fun at. It's all right there, I need not explain the fallaciousness of that claim, because it's right there for all to see.
He then talks about fictional characters after putting Hannibal Lecter on his list of evil "real" people. Again, I can't add much to that because it's already right there.
As for his mission statement -- his delightful little delusion.
Allow me to inject reality into it.
You're going to lose. Limbs won't fly, destruction and murder won't be had.
Because you're nothing but a poser.
A lying, disgraceful poser masquerading as a beast.
In reality, you're a mangy, flea bitten mutt who will be put down. Out of its misery.
You're welcome.