(04-27-2014, 06:47 AM)Kendall Sawyer Said:

(04-27-2014, 06:37 AM)SwagMire Said:

(04-27-2014, 06:29 AM)Kendall Sawyer Said: Ad hominem.

Care to actually defend yourself while sticking to the topic of this argument instead of bringing up egregiously off topic insults? Oh, you can't?

Makes sense.

You are, as it stands, nothing but a worthless little coward, so I guess I should've seen that coming.

Now please, cry over the fact that a supposed "mini-Diaz" (whatever that means) not only dismantled your entire argument, but also deduced the reasoning behind your fallacious retort.

Or, continue this flawed train of thought and make yourself look even further like the idiot everyone already knows you to be.

"It means you stole your personality from a mentally unstable little red head and a Ben Gibbard song. Or was it Chris Connelly? Yoshimi perhaps? And no, you didn't destroy my argument, since you doing so would have had to include knowledge of me agreeing to matches already. Just not your little queer friend's. Pretty sure given Luca's record accepting a match from him is a bigger deal than one from Major Flagg over there."

Irrelevant.

Your entire argument about Heyman was that if he were to decline allowing Tommy Gunn to be in the match that was discussed earlier, he was a coward and he would only say yes to prove that he isn't a coward.

Now, that's all fine and dandy but you declined a challenge recently on the grounds of being "above" the person challenging you.

Now, this isn't a false dichotomy because you tried to back someone into a corner with this accusation. You are a coward for turning down a challenge, especially from someone you claim is below you because you didn't take into account that Heyman would've used the same tactic were he to decline this challenge on Gunn's behalf.

You jumped right to coward.

And thus, you are a coward.