Technically, yes, your brain works and connects dots. Can it explain why something is beautiful? No. One can say 'someone thinks this is beautiful because your brain fires off this, etc' but that still doesn't explain beauty. Love is just a bunch of chemicals being fired in our brain, then why die for someone? Why give two cents worth? Why get married or have a relationship? If it's just how our brain is merely interpreting current things, it's pointless. Yeah, one could argue about perception, but it doesn't really answer anything.

The Bible we have (I'm talking the Arabic, Hebrew, and Greek manuscripts, not various translations) is actually very close to the original and does not waiver on the core principals/doctrine of Christianity. The writings of Plato, for example, are taken without questioning. The writings of his stuff were around 427-347 B.C., and the earliest copy found was 900 A.D. which is roughly 1200 year difference. I think 7 copies were found. Herodotus had writings around 480 B.C. and the first copy found was also 900 A.D., with 8 copies. Aristotle wrote in 300's B.C. and the earliest manuscript found was in 1100 A.D. None of these writings are questioned. The New Testament was written between 50-100 A.D., and the first copy found was 130 A.D with 5600 copies. These 5600 copies found were not technically the complete Bible, but a few writings here and there in different locations.. and they all matched. This is the writing people question.

When you boil the theory of evolution at its process... yes.. a snake became a talking person. In the order, no it did not. In evolution, we all came from the same explosion... which, if you think about it logically, we are the same as a brick wall except we adapted or survived. We came from the same place/explosion. It's just matter and energy.

Evolution cannot be observed, which is why it's technically not science. It's a theory. The Big Bang cannot be recreated.

Just like scientists were not there when the big bang happened and believe it by studying other observations... I wasn't there when God created the world but do observe 'miracles'. This is a terribly analogy, but I'm going to go with it. A man finds a watch in the middle of the woods.. does he think it came together or because of the way it works and is formed.. there is a creator... logic says creator.. but when we look at the complexity of a human eye, we think evolution and not a designer.

The Bible even talked about the Earth being a "sphere" when it was argued it was flat.

As far as the consequences go, it's not backwards deduction. I didn't fit God into my belief. I'm not saying all, but some atheists will point to things because it fits their theory instead of listening to all evidence. Sure, we can develop a morality code but everyone has opinions, therefore, morality would be subjective. If morality is subjective, then we have no right to tell someone what they do is wrong just because we see it as wrong.

Jesus lived. That cannot be refuted. Who Jesus was is what can be refuted. I see many authors who eye-witnessed Jesus, and if they were lying ... there were enough people to destroy or write against it if it were false. Plus, if I were writing.. I wouldn't make myself look bad.. but they did.