(07-18-2021, 03:20 PM)Charlie Nickles Said:

(07-18-2021, 03:02 PM)Corey Smith Said: OOC: My issue with the attacks thing is it just makes the teams getting attacked look really dumb. Why wouldn't the other members have come out to help their team mates? Do we have to strat in "I will help my friends and team mates if they get attacked" everytime now?

ooc: Yeah, you should obviously have to imo? Like there's an entire counter-attack system for a reason. If you are, in character, concerned about your friends being attacked: you should prepare to go out and defend them! Otherwise the alternative is no attacks on anyone with friends or in a tag team because it would make the tag team look bad and the tag team doesn't want to write counter attacks.

No it would mean GMs can edit the attacks to have them make more sense.

The fact is that nobody can accurately predict all the time who is going to attack when. But if it does happen it would make sense for other friends booked on the card to help them.

I'm not confused or caught off guard by any of this. Hell, I can think of a prime example of when I used an attack segment. The difference is that i corporated that person's allies so that it would make a lick of sense. They lost the attack, but at least they didnt d8ssappear off the face of the Earth.

I feel like GMs should have more editorial control over this.