Please Login or Register to get full access to the forums.

Lost Password?
Current time: 06-09-2024, 12:20 AM (time should display as Pacific time zone; please contact Admin if it appears to be wrong)                                                                


X-treme Wrestling Federation » XWF OOC » Out Of Character (OOC) Board
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Important! CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING'
Author Message
Vincent Lane Offline
Rock n' Rolling XWF Owner and Megastar
*********
Administrators



XWF FanBase:
(.Awaiting user update)


#19
01-10-2018, 05:55 AM

(01-10-2018, 01:48 AM)Imperial Said: That's definitely just scummy. But active fedders poaching members shouldn't be a problem by that logic. It's one thing for a throwaway account to spam the Fed just to poach members.

Let's take Reno for instance.

He's a cuck.

But if he was actively role-playing here, and poaching, his sole purpose of being here is no longer to poach. He also happens to be running his own side gig.


There are probably some places that wouldn't mind that scenario, provided it was on the up and up. Generally speaking though, there is a degree of deception and clandestine activity, which is generally a bad sign regardless of what you're doing.

If you came to me and said hey man I really want to run a fed, would you mind if I ask a few guys if they want to participate, I'd most likely say go for it. I might even offer to help you. But if you go behind my back and utilizse resources that you only have access to because I let you? Not great, Bob.



(01-10-2018, 05:49 AM)Maddy and Engy Said: Personally, I've just always seen it as a respect thing. I've seen other feds though that circumvented the issue by having a separate board where people could post admin approved links to other feds, but that was the only activity that was allowed. Keeps it all above board, removes the dirty "backroom deal" feel of poaching, and people can check out other feds at their lesiure. XWF doesn't need to do that obviously, but I always thought it was a decent work around.


There are a lot of problems that can arise from those situations, and I think they HAVE arisen from it here in the past. That's why it isn't done here. There are definitely other feds that work together that way, and that's fine.

Like I said, if anyone wants to be in multiple feds, that's their own choice. But when dishonesty comes into play, I lose any will to be helpful.

Hate Post Like Post
[-] The following 3 users Like Vincent Lane's post:
Imperial (01-11-2018), JimCaedus (01-10-2018), Phantom Panzer (01-10-2018)


Messages In This Thread
CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by Vincent Lane - 10-21-2017, 01:32 PM
CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by Equinox - 10-21-2017, 02:52 PM
re:CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by Vincent Lane - 10-21-2017, 05:25 PM
CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by Equinox - 10-21-2017, 07:50 PM
CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by Finn Kühn - 01-09-2018, 02:53 PM
CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by John Holliday - 01-09-2018, 04:04 PM
CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by Imperial - 01-09-2018, 07:11 PM
re:CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by Vincent Lane - 01-09-2018, 07:13 PM
CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by Imperial - 01-10-2018, 01:48 AM
CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by The Engineer - 01-10-2018, 05:49 AM
re:CLARIFICATION ON 'POACHING' - by Vincent Lane - 01-10-2018, 05:55 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)